Jump to content

Wikimedia: Difference between revisions

110 bytes removed ,  2 July 2005
Line 25: Line 25:
==Wikimedia's bias==
==Wikimedia's bias==


Many dispute Wales' contribution and neutrality. The much vaunted [[wiki ideology]] of "[[neutral point of view]]" is also very strongly criticized: "Though other editors ostensibly correct misinformation, there is no procedure to assure correction and when corrections are made, it can happen hours, days or weeks after the misinformation has been served and forked to readers and to other web services.
Many dispute Wales' contribution and neutrality. The much vaunted [[wiki ideology]] of "[[neutral point of view]]" is also very strongly criticized: Though other editors ostensibly correct misinformation, there is no procedure to assure correction and when corrections are made, it can happen hours, days or weeks after the misinformation has been served and forked to readers and to other web services.


During election or war-time propaganda campaigns, a few hours of misinformation can be useful, but this possibility of disinformation cannot be avoided in [[wiki]]s.
During election or war-time propaganda campaigns, a few hours of misinformation can be useful, but this possibility of disinformation cannot be avoided in [[wiki]]s.
Line 31: Line 31:
Jimmy Wales claims to try to stay out of dipute resolution  
Jimmy Wales claims to try to stay out of dipute resolution  
and remain "neutral" as much as possible "so as to not influence editorial decisions,"
and remain "neutral" as much as possible "so as to not influence editorial decisions,"
but it is apparent that he does intervene, e.g. the notorious case of [[English Wikipedia User Secretlondon]]. Wales, in a classic example of [[Wikimedia]] [[thuggery]],  asked her in email to "Please stop it." He influences others who do "dispute resolution" and also very often
but it is apparent that he does intervene, e.g. the notorious case of [[English Wikipedia User Secretlondon]].   He can influence others who do "dispute resolution" and sometimes will
[[block IP]]s for "[[vandalism]]".  This is  
[[block IP]]s for "[[vandalism]]".  This is  
the most "[[sysop vigilantiism|heavily abused power]]", "especially" when  
the most "[[sysop vigilantiism|heavily abused power]]", "especially" when  
extended to so-called "[[trolls]]".
extended to "[[trolls]]".


When Wales "chats" with other users they get a picture of how "Jimbo"
When Wales "chats" with other users they get a picture of how he
tends to see things and usually "[[defer]]" to this person who they see
tends to see things and usually "[[defer]]" to this person who they see
as a [[GodKing|awe-inspiring founder]].  Certain [[sycophant]]s skew
as a [[GodKing|awe-inspiring founder]].  Certain [[sycophant]]s skew
issues towards the way "Jimbo" sees them.  None of these are unusual:
issues towards the way the founder sees them.  None of these are unusual:
[[Group dynamics]] suggest that this cannot be avoided but staying concious about this kind of phemonemom helps to minimize the damage it does, the [[systemic bias]] it creates, [[groupthink]] reinforced.
[[Group dynamics]] suggest that this cannot be avoided but staying concious about this kind of phemonemom helps to minimize the damage it does, the [[systemic bias]] it creates, [[groupthink]] reinforced.


Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.