Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| There is no one agreed perspective on '''Wikipedia''' [http://www.wikipedia.org/ (.org)] and its role in [[Consumerium Services]]. It is an extremely controversial project and so any relation to it is controversial. For now, [[w:]] links to background articles in [[Develop Wiki]] redirect to '''Wikipedia''' as a source of [[enemy project]] perspectives: views of reality from a far-right or fascist point of view i.e. that of "[[Wikimedia]]", "[[America]]" or the [[EPOV]], based on [[might makes right]] and [[technological escalation]] against any objectors.
| | *delete this page |
| | | *move [[Wikipedia (neutral)]] here |
| Because of this controversy, it is proposed that [[Research Wiki]] background articles default to [[Wikinfo]] instead. Its [[sympathetic point of view]] is much less amenable to [[usurper]] activity than the [[neutral point of view]]:
| | *delete [[Wikipedia (neutral)]] |
| | |
| See
| |
| *[[Wikipedia (neutral)]] - a more balanced view of the project than [[w:Wikipedia]] which is self-promotional | |
| *[[Wikipedia (Reds)]] - a critical perspective from those seeking to [[end Wikimedia]], and some contributions that were formative in that perspective: | |
| ::[[Wikipedia (Richard Chilton)]]
| |
| ::[[Wikipedia (142 trolls)]]
| |
| ::[[Wikipedia Red Faction]]
| |
| | |
| | |
| '''External links:'''
| |
| *http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Anti-rules
| |