| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 13: |
Line 13: |
|
| |
|
| :::This could be [[factionally defined]] if there is a way for [[faction]]s to register [[distrust]] in each other's methods and reduce their power if a [[Consumerium:audit]] shows them abusing proxies or something. Make them compete to create invincible systems of authentication, or none, as long as they dont claim to speak for [[individual buying criteria]] that they don't speak for. | | :::This could be [[factionally defined]] if there is a way for [[faction]]s to register [[distrust]] in each other's methods and reduce their power if a [[Consumerium:audit]] shows them abusing proxies or something. Make them compete to create invincible systems of authentication, or none, as long as they dont claim to speak for [[individual buying criteria]] that they don't speak for. |
|
| |
| ----
| |
| = Old obsoleted plans =
| |
| The voting pages are most obviously "noindex, nofollow" ( stops search engines from indexing ) and furthermore copyright of the wiki user i.e. '''not copylefted'''. If someone wants to publish vote sets in another namespace this surely will be allowed or even recommended. ( If NGOs want to publish vote sets it's sort of the revival of the [[indirect vote]]. )
| |
|
| |
| ''See [[edits, votes and bets]] for the debate about how to decide the final
| |
| [[Consumerium buying signal]].''
| |
|
| |
| Some basic paradigms have been suggested to measure the support of [[campaigns]]:
| |
| *[[Direct Vote]] requires many votes and rewards heavy participation, and,
| |
| *[[Indirect Vote]] requires fewer votes and rewards [[faction]] organization
| |
| *and the oddly-named [[WikiVote]] which seems to overlap with both of them
| |
|
| |
| ==To vote or not to vote?==
| |
| The Policy on Consumerium is that '''voting''' is discouraged for various reasons.
| |
|
| |
| #) By voting you open up yourself to severe consumption pattern profiling. Please consider [[not using real name]] if you intend to vote.
| |
| #) We don't want any sorts of census effect à la facebook. So please, srsly, don't vote.
| |
| #) Voting is unwiki
| |
| #) ...
| |
| ----
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| ==Planned onwiki vote structure==
| |
|
| |
| *[[User:Username/My representational vote]] (i.e. proxy or [[Indirect Vote]], this is probably not used at all in the end)
| |
| *[[User:Username/Boycotts]]
| |
| *[[User:Username/Avoids]]
| |
| *[[User:Username/Supports]]
| |
| *[[User:Username/Recommends]]
| |
| *[[User:Username/Hedges]]
| |
| *[[User:Username/Hedges heavily]]
| |
|
| |
| Use following syntax (vote only once on each "thing")
| |
|
| |
| *[[Company X]]
| |
| *[[Country X]]
| |
| *[[Product group X]]
| |
| *...
| |
|
| |
| One can add any number of reasons by prefixing like this (you can intermix commas with "and"s so don't worry about that.
| |
|
| |
| '''[[Company X]] for [[Reason 1]], [[Reason 2]] and [[Reason 3]]'''
| |
|
| |
| in the above articles to cast your votes. Vote only once on one thing
| |
|
| |
| ==Voting in the future==
| |
| In the future you can use one line to vote on multiple entities on one line.
| |
|
| |
| *[[User:Username/Prefers]]
| |
| *[[User:Username/Prefers strongly]]
| |
|
| |
| All votables that are before the keyword '''over''' gets voted up and every votable after that gets voted down.
| |
|
| |
| *<font color="Green">Prefers [[X]]</font><font color="Red"> over [[Y]] </font>results in +1 and -1 respectively
| |
|
| |
| *<font color="Green">Strongly prefers [[X]] and [[Y]] </font><font color="Red"> over Z </font> results in +2, +2 and -2 respectively
| |
|
| |
| * <font color=green>Strongly prefers [[Product X]] and [[Product Y]]<font color=red> over [[Product Z]]</font> <for [[reason 1]]>
| |
|
| |
| etc.etc.
| |
|
| |
| ----
| |
|
| |
| ==What's this I keep hearing about a dual voting system?==
| |
| [[Indirect Vote]]s probably won't be implemented due to lack of interest
| |