Editing Troll Board
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A '''Troll Board''' is like a parole board (even kind of sounds like it) that decides which trolls are indefensible due to [[libel]], [[outing]], difficult-to-define [[vandalism]] or whatever they might do. Note that [[sysop]]s count as [[trolls]] too under this definition*, so where a Troll Board exists, sysops can be bounced. Recruitment to this board is probably based on whoever has been most obviously oppressed by [[sysop power structure]], [[libel]], [[outing]], etc.. | A '''Troll Board''' is like a parole board (even kind of sounds like it) that decides which trolls are indefensible due to [[libel]], [[outing]], difficult-to-define [[vandalism]] or whatever they might do. Note that [[sysop]]s count as [[trolls]] too under this definition*, so where a Troll Board exists, sysops can be bounced. Recruitment to this board is probably based on whoever has been most obviously oppressed by [[sysop power structure]], [[libel]], [[outing]], etc.. | ||
A Troll Board usually comes into existence when a [[Lowest Troll]] goes insane and starts to build a [[sysop power structure]] accountable only to themselves, consort with [[GodKing]]s, or be cowed by [[libel chill]] or the invention of [[spun threat]]s for which they might be "held responsible" - even though they did not occur. Once such corporate intimidation, e.g. from Bomis, begins, it is difficult to imagine that it would not lead to other such intimidation, e.g. from [[Monsanto]], [[McDonald's]], [[Exxon]], [[Coca-Cola]] and others who are good at frightening those critical of their [[worst practices]]. | A Troll Board usually comes into existence when a [[Lowest Troll]] goes insane and starts to build a [[sysop power structure]] accountable only to themselves, consort with [[GodKing]]s, or be cowed by [[libel chill]] or the invention of [[spun threat]]s for which they might be "held responsible" - even though they did not occur. [http://dissertations.biz/thesis.php dissertations writing service] Once such corporate intimidation, e.g. from Bomis, begins, it is difficult to imagine that it would not lead to other such intimidation, e.g. from [[Monsanto]], [[McDonald's]], [[Exxon]], [[Coca-Cola]] and others who are good at frightening those critical of their [[worst practices]]. | ||
Such a board would still be responsible to [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] where delivery of [[Consumerium Services]] are concerned. | Such a board would still be responsible to [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] where delivery of [[Consumerium Services]] are concerned. |