Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| guys, what the hell are you talking about? i go to wikipedia, click on 'discuss this page', click on 'criticism', and there is 'consumerium', and some weird thing comes up talking about reds, and this and that and the other. what the heck is consumerium, how about starting off with that?
| | #REDIRECT [[Talk:Wikipedia_(from_142_perspective)]] |
| | |
| hello people. make it plain, make it simple, make it understandable english.
| |
| | |
| -------
| |
| | |
| | |
| ''See [[Talk:Wikipedia (neutral)]], [[Talk:Wikipedia (Reds)]], [[Talk:Wikipedia (Richard Chilton)]] or [[Talk:Wikipedia_(142_trolls)]] to comment on any version of this article. This page is only for discussion of how [[Wikipedia]] relates to [[Consumerium]], not an attempt to rehash all of [[m:]] and etc.''
| |
| | |
| OK, let's be clear: what is the relation of [[Wikipedia]] to the [[GFDL corpus]], and of that corpus to [[Consumerium]], legally and editorially?
| |
| | |
| How exposed are [[Consumerium:We]] to [[Wikimedia corruption|their lies and stupidity]]?
| |