Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
|
| |
|
| If you want to know more about it, the more anarchist [[Recyclopedia]] studies it, so see their article on it: *http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=wiki_witchhunt | | If you want to know more about it, the more anarchist [[Recyclopedia]] studies it, so see their article on it: *http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=wiki_witchhunt |
|
| |
| :Woops censored by [[sysop vandalism]] via [[denial of service attack]] via [[vandalbot]] via Tim... ooh let's not go there.
| |
|
| |
| -------------
| |
|
| |
| Seems it ''is'' happening here, with emergence of articles like [[Craig Hubley]]. How should [[Consumerium:We|we]] respond?
| |
|
| |
| Is it really the case that someone can write lies about [[Craig Hubley]] but they cannot tell the truth about [[Gus Kouwenhoven]], at [[Consumerium]]? If so what good is it?
| |
|
| |
| --------------
| |
|
| |
| It seems entirely reasonable to assume that someone is from a [[faction]] espousing [[Sysop Vandal point of view]] if they dredge up old junk articles that have no credibility at all and republish them here after they've died and started to rot. That is neither [[New Troll point of view]] nor is calling someone an advocate of that [[SVpov]] a [[wiki witchhunt]]: there has been no attempt at [[outing]] or even relating the whole thing to an overall strategy by the [[Wikipedia]] [[sysop power structure]].
| |