Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 24: |
Line 24: |
|
| |
|
| ::So make [[en:w:]] and [[fr:w:]] work, and disable the reverse, and we'll try to solve language problems; until then, you are asking us to solve Wikipedia problems, and we refuse | | ::So make [[en:w:]] and [[fr:w:]] work, and disable the reverse, and we'll try to solve language problems; until then, you are asking us to solve Wikipedia problems, and we refuse |
|
| |
| ::[[en:gfdl:]] and [[en:neutral:]] would be even better. Then the best GFDL source, or best neutral source, could be determined dynamically by the service, without requiring every author to care, or track the decline of [[Wikipedia]] or the rise of [[Wikinfo]] or [[Metaweb]] or whatever. Really the best GFDL source this week is [[Recyclopedia]] since it has a very recent [[Wikipedia]] dump, and more accurate articles that have no censorship of concepts critical to [[Consumerium]].
| |