Talk:Urban ecology: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 4: Line 4:


:Usually the most interesting articles are attacked heavily.  See [[w:wealth]] and [[w:political economy]].  I put three interesting cut-outs in [[political economy]] here, and perhaps we need [[wealth]] and [[power]] stated here too alon with the other key concepts:
:Usually the most interesting articles are attacked heavily.  See [[w:wealth]] and [[w:political economy]].  I put three interesting cut-outs in [[political economy]] here, and perhaps we need [[wealth]] and [[power]] stated here too alon with the other key concepts:
*[[safe]], [[done]] are probably [[individual]] ideas
*[[safe]], [[done]] are probably [[individual]] ideas gained from viewing [[ecology]] of some kind ([[urban ecology]], [[industrial ecology]] and of course real natural [[ecology]]).  So you get a different mind from living different lives.
*[[fair]], [[evil]] are probably [[instructional]]  
*[[fair]], [[evil]] are probably [[instructional]] - like [[w:moral code]] - or aesthetic - like [[w:moral core]].
*[[ignore]], [[forgive]] are probably [[social]]
*[[ignore]], [[forgive]] are probably [[social]] maybe tied to [[ecoregion]] - I can ignore or forgive different things in a desert than a boat than a house.
*[[faction]], [[amoral purchasing]] are [[political]] whatever that means.
*[[faction]], [[amoral purchasing]] are [[political]] whatever that means.


I think you get all that right, you probably can make [[Consumerium]] work.
I think you get all that right, you probably can make [[Consumerium]] work.
Anonymous user