Talk:Urban ecology: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    No edit summary
    No edit summary
     
    (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
    Line 4: Line 4:


    :Usually the most interesting articles are attacked heavily.  See [[w:wealth]] and [[w:political economy]].  I put three interesting cut-outs in [[political economy]] here, and perhaps we need [[wealth]] and [[power]] stated here too alon with the other key concepts:
    :Usually the most interesting articles are attacked heavily.  See [[w:wealth]] and [[w:political economy]].  I put three interesting cut-outs in [[political economy]] here, and perhaps we need [[wealth]] and [[power]] stated here too alon with the other key concepts:
    *[[safe]], [[done]]
    *[[safe]], [[done]] are probably [[individual]] ideas gained from viewing [[ecology]] of some kind ([[urban ecology]], [[industrial ecology]] and of course real natural [[ecology]]).  So you get a different mind from living different lives.
    *[[fair]], [[evil]]
    *[[fair]], [[evil]] are probably [[instructional]] - like [[w:moral code]] - or aesthetic - like [[w:moral core]].
    *[[ignore]], [[forgive]]
    *[[ignore]], [[forgive]] are probably [[social]] maybe tied to [[ecoregion]] - I can ignore or forgive different things in a desert than a boat than a house.
    *[[faction]], [[amoral purchasing]]
    *[[faction]], [[amoral purchasing]] are [[political]] whatever that means.


    I think you get all that right, you probably can make [[Consumerium]] work.
    I think you get all that right, you probably can make [[Consumerium]] work.

    Latest revision as of 09:12, 28 April 2003

    'f course, anything thought irrelevant to this place, can just fly away to the english wikipedia (where people will either ignore it, or tear it into pieces :-))

    I think if the term is 'out there" and being used by others, it should be in the w:urban ecology article place, if only so that you can see who else is interested enough ithe concept to edit it, and who then to attract over here.
    Usually the most interesting articles are attacked heavily. See w:wealth and w:political economy. I put three interesting cut-outs in political economy here, and perhaps we need wealth and power stated here too alon with the other key concepts:

    I think you get all that right, you probably can make Consumerium work.