Talk:Urban ecology: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'f course, anything thought irrelevant to this place, can just fly away to the english wikipedia (where people will either ignore it, or tear it into pieces :-)) | 'f course, anything thought irrelevant to this place, can just fly away to the english wikipedia (where people will either ignore it, or tear it into pieces :-)) | ||
:I think if the term is 'out there" and being used by others, it should be in the [[w:urban ecology]] article place, if only so that you can see who else is interested enough ithe concept to edit it, and who then to attract over here. | |||
:Usually the most interesting articles are attacked heavily. See [[w:wealth]] and [[w:political economy]]. I put three interesting cut-outs in [[political economy]] here, and perhaps we need [[wealth]] and [[power]] stated here too alon with the other key concepts: | |||
*[[safe]], [[done]] are probably [[individual]] ideas gained from viewing [[ecology]] of some kind ([[urban ecology]], [[industrial ecology]] and of course real natural [[ecology]]). So you get a different mind from living different lives. | |||
*[[fair]], [[evil]] are probably [[instructional]] - like [[w:moral code]] - or aesthetic - like [[w:moral core]]. | |||
*[[ignore]], [[forgive]] are probably [[social]] maybe tied to [[ecoregion]] - I can ignore or forgive different things in a desert than a boat than a house. | |||
*[[faction]], [[amoral purchasing]] are [[political]] whatever that means. | |||
I think you get all that right, you probably can make [[Consumerium]] work. | |||