Talk:Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption
142, please provide specifics and references for these claims.
- Doing so for new claims; However, since lies, libel and echo chamber fraud are freely spread on vile mailing lists run by Wikimedia without any such specifics or references, it might be abusive to require such documentation from their opponents; most specific references are in the sub-articles using the most infamous Wikimedia clowns as the universal bad example for how not to do wiki governance.
- Is being blocked in China evidence of corruption? hm. Trolls would say no, but, sysop power structure would have to respect China's power structure and their pet sysops who are their friends in fascist power plays. - hail to the red faction!
The partially released results of the Wikimedia Board of Trustees "election" proves what trolls have always said: it is a front for the sysop power structure:
"The top 3 for contributing rep were:
Anthere 269 Eloquence 258 (Erik Moeller) Maveric149 163 ((Daniel Mayer)
The top 2 for for volunteer rep:
Angela 345 (Auntie Angela) Maveric149 159" (Daniel Mayer)
And the only non-vandal, English Wikipedia User Anthere, barely beat a vigilante for the job! It is obvious that the next "election" will simply put one of the fascists in place, and that they use their sysop power structure to gain votes for themselves.
Fagcist Daniel Mayer exploited the above to argue that Erik Moeller have a special "Gestapo" position created for himself to undermine the authority of English Wikipedia User Anthere, a predictable tactic.