Talk:Trolling: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:"I presume that it was blocked for 'trolling'. - Mark" | :"I presume that it was blocked for 'trolling'. - Mark" | ||
:Why yes of course. And perhaps Wikipedia in Chinese is even somewhat [[heroic trolling]], given that it allows wider opinions than the Chinese media do. But maybe they block Wikipedia because Wikipedia does not respect [[w:User:Plato/red_faction|its own red faction]] or offer them a chance to displace [[Bomis]], as they should. | :Why yes of course. And perhaps Wikipedia in Chinese is even somewhat [[heroic trolling]], given that it allows wider opinions than the Chinese media do. But maybe they block Wikipedia because Wikipedia does not respect [[w:User:Plato/red_faction|its own red faction]] or offer them a chance to displace [[Bomis]], as they should. As surely as the Communists displaced the Nationalists in China, the wikipedia red faction will replace the [[usurper]]s of [[Bomis]] and end their [[Wikimedia corruption]]. | ||
Revision as of 01:06, 16 June 2004
Right on! --Juxo 18:01, 1 Jun 2004 (EEST)
- Yes, we might also differentiate between ordinary trolling, heroic trolling and truly magnificent trolling! Trolls must have a hierarchy since there is a Lowest Troll!
w:User:Mark Richards's sarcastic comments on the technological escalation by the Chinese government against Wikipedia.
- "I presume that it was blocked for 'trolling'. - Mark"
- Why yes of course. And perhaps Wikipedia in Chinese is even somewhat heroic trolling, given that it allows wider opinions than the Chinese media do. But maybe they block Wikipedia because Wikipedia does not respect its own red faction or offer them a chance to displace Bomis, as they should. As surely as the Communists displaced the Nationalists in China, the wikipedia red faction will replace the usurpers of Bomis and end their Wikimedia corruption.