Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Could be [[common sense]], could be [[nonsense]], could be in one sense or another. A sense is what turns [[Noise Wiki|noise]] into [[Signal Wiki|signal]]. | | Could be [[common sense]], could be [[nonsense]], could be in one sense or another. A sense is what turns [[Noise Wiki|noise]] into [[Signal Wiki|signal]]. |
|
| |
| :So shouldn't THIS ([[Development Wiki]]) be the [[Sense Wiki]] since here are the rules and rationale decided upon which turn [[Noise Wiki|Noises]] (from The [[Research Wiki]]) into [[Signal Wiki|Signals]] --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 22:51, 14 Mar 2004 (EET)
| |
|
| |
| ::No, because developers are basically just noise-makers and noise-filterers. (all serious [[software development concepts]] acknowledge chaos, and the eight-arrowed chaos logo should be the development/noise wiki logo!). It is the researchers who provide the sense, the sniffing out, the intelligence. The world doesn't work by rules. It is chaos, and [[trolls]] simply direct the chaos by organizing it into [[faction]]s and [[campaign]]s, but it stays chaos. Any sense comes from the researchers. And rubber-stamping it as "OK this is a [[Consumerium buying signal|signal]]" is an editorial decision, not anything objective. Let's not buy into the [http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=risk_society en: Recyclopedia: risk society] concept of reality, where somehow there are rational top-down rules that are objectively applied. There aren't, and there never will be.
| |