Editing Talk:Publish:namespace

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
As far as I know there are no [[wiki]]'s out there that provide for dynamic article sharing  
As far as I know there are no [[wiki]]'s out there that provide for dynamic article sharing (so far) I can understand that this is not much of an issue of importance to the [[MediaWiki]] since their main focus is to provide software for the [[Wikipedia]] encyclopedia, which given it's monolithic structure and it's huge article, editor and reader space is not much interesting in setting up schemes, where other wikies would control the content of some [[article]]s and those be only dynamically mirrored to WP. Their huge size makes them uninterested in using smaller specialist [[wiki]]s to provide specialist coverage since it seems that they already have lots of specialists in every conceivable field of knowledge (and at least triple amount of people that like to consider themselves to also be the specialists).


:Then you copy the articles when they are published.  But you cannot simply let the whole [[Research:]] base be published, that liability is extreme, you simply have no capacity to do research without publishing it.  This works for [[Wikipedia]] only because no one cares what they say, but when [[Consumerium buying signal]] is on every [[worn device]], lawsuits will fly.
The main point regarding the situation described above (there is no http://wikiarticlebroker.org , nor any wiki software that currently supports such an setup) we are not going to have a [[Publish Wiki]] we are going to publish as HTML primarily. The manual, redundant workload, having too many wikis to vandalize and to cause incoherence in is something we are simply not going to do. If you develop software for '''version controlling spanning multiple wikis and dynamic content mirroring''' then by all means let's have three wikis, otherwise: NO --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 18:36, 27 Aug 2005 (GMT)
 
(so far) I can understand that this is not much of an issue of importance to the [[MediaWiki]] since their main focus is to provide software for the [[Wikipedia]] encyclopedia, which given it's monolithic structure and it's huge article, editor and reader space is not much interesting in setting up schemes, where other wikies would control the content of some [[article]]s and those be only dynamically mirrored to WP.
 
:Also they deliberately refuse to publish controversial truths.  Which is what Consumerium MUST do.  So the mediawiki software may ultimately be a big problem here.
 
:[[getwiki]] has dynamic article sharing and [[XML import]]ing, and [[tikiwiki]] does too - in the next release tikiwiki will supposedly allow [[wikitext standard]] to be used and imported!  Making it the obvious choice.  Also tikiwiki has a working "[[mobile mode]]", though it's not too functional, it works well with [[HawHaw]].
 
Their huge size makes them uninterested in using smaller specialist [[wiki]]s to provide specialist coverage since it seems that they already have lots of specialists in every conceivable field of knowledge (and at least triple amount of people that like to consider themselves to also be the specialists).
 
:At least.  So they are unlikely to solve this problem.
 
The main point regarding the situation described above (there is no http://wikiarticlebroker.org , nor any wiki software that currently supports such an setup) we are not going to have a [[Publish Wiki]] we are going to publish as HTML primarily.  
 
:OK but we still need a [[Publish:namespace]] even if it is not actually "a wiki".  So the scheme described in [[namespace]] stands.  The fact that the namespace shows up as HTML and is not editable easily is irrelevant.  The [[Consumerium Governance Organization]]'s advisors, directors and lawyers can edit it, and that is enough.
 
The manual, redundant workload, having too many wikis to vandalize and to cause incoherence in is something we are simply not going to do. If you develop software for '''version controlling spanning multiple wikis and dynamic content mirroring''' then by all means let's have three wikis, otherwise: NO --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 18:36, 27 Aug 2005 (GMT)
 
:There is no potential for [[vandalism]] if the Publish function is very restricted to the trusted people listed.
 
:Talk to the [[tikiwiki]] people, and to [[wikidev.net]], both of which are doing this.
Please note that all contributions to Consumerium development wiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see Consumerium:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)
Retrieved from "https://develop.consumerium.org/wiki/Talk:Publish:namespace"