Talk:Link transit: Difference between revisions

158 bytes added ,  8 September 2004
no edit summary
(a third display: paths)
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
:::::[[Trolls]] doubt that very much.
:::::[[Trolls]] doubt that very much.
::::but wouldn't that be better served by popularity data than link transit data?  
::::but wouldn't that be better served by popularity data than link transit data?  
::::::Restoring the information about page popularity is also quite useful.  But more useful is information about paths between, i.e. that the single most popular path was for instance [[Wikipedia]] -> [[sysop vandalism]] -> [[Wikimedia]] -> [[tabloid journalism]] would demonstrate that people actually had understood the subjects correctly and went to the next most logical page to learn about the nature of each beast, while a path from [[Robert Kaiser]] -> [[Nazipedia]] -> [[Anti-Anti-Anti-Anti-Zionism]] would perhaps indicate a quite confused person who was pretty much being subjected to a pile of [[propaganda]]
:::::Restoring the information about page popularity is also quite useful.  But more useful is information about paths between, i.e. that the single most popular path was for instance [[Wikipedia]] -> [[GFDL corpus]] -> [[sysop vandalism]] -> [[Wikimedia]] -> [[libel suit]] -> [[tabloid journalism]] would demonstrate that people actually had understood the subjects correctly and went to the next most logical page to learn the next most important thing, while a path from [[Zionism]] -> [[Robert Kaiser]] -> [[Nazipedia]] -> [[Anti-Anti-Anti-Anti-Zionism]] would perhaps indicate a quite confused person who was pretty much being subjected to a pile of [[propaganda]] and would come away with a quite different impression of the subject than what a serious editor would want.
::::What would you do with link transit information? How do you "elaborate" a link? The best use of it I can think of is to pick a small set of related articles, and draw pretty graph pictures. A noble goal, to be sure, but it would require a change to the program below to generate such data efficiently. -- [[User:Tim Starling|Tim Starling]] 06:30, 6 Sep 2004 (EEST)
::::What would you do with link transit information? How do you "elaborate" a link? The best use of it I can think of is to pick a small set of related articles, and draw pretty graph pictures. A noble goal, to be sure, but it would require a change to the program below to generate such data efficiently. -- [[User:Tim Starling|Tim Starling]] 06:30, 6 Sep 2004 (EEST)


Anonymous user