Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 4: |
Line 4: |
|
| |
|
| http://www2.iro.umontreal.ca/~paquetse/cgi-bin/wiki.cgi?Create_Normative_Specifications_For_Resource_Allocations | | http://www2.iro.umontreal.ca/~paquetse/cgi-bin/wiki.cgi?Create_Normative_Specifications_For_Resource_Allocations |
|
| |
| :Not under that name, which suggests it's about policy. But certainly you could treat the creation of such "specifications" as part of [[institutional buying criteria]] and it is absolutely relevant to other questions like [http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=monetary_reform monetary reform].
| |
|
| |
| :For example, an institution might choose not to demand or purchase goods that it must compete for against destitute individuals.
| |
|
| |
| ::Would this practice of non-competition differ from the ''typically confidential'' non-competition clauses commonly seen in written contracts?
| |
|
| |
| :::Only in that an institution would probably broadcast that it was refusing to compete and raise prices of scarce goods - or, perhaps better, would let poorer people participate and gain economies of scale when institutions buy things.
| |
|
| |
| ::::Or the attached strings would include a "no [[reverse engineering|reverse engineer]]" clause
| |