Talk:Export-import: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(is this worth pursuing? probably not - new software will be required, and it's probably custom) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
They haven't even cloned the [[GetWiki]] facility yet, and it's the ideal way to keep those who [[fork off]] the [[GFDL corpus]] as close to the core corpus as possible. That is of course because they are trying to stop all other [[GFDL corpus access provider]]s, and retain [[trademark]] power over the name "wikipedia", which is actually generic. There are many wikipedias, and the contributor is not seeking to enable or give their work to any specific bunch of "[[Wikimedia]]" thugs, they're seeking to give it to all wikipedias. | They haven't even cloned the [[GetWiki]] facility yet, and it's the ideal way to keep those who [[fork off]] the [[GFDL corpus]] as close to the core corpus as possible. That is of course because they are trying to stop all other [[GFDL corpus access provider]]s, and retain [[trademark]] power over the name "wikipedia", which is actually generic. There are many wikipedias, and the contributor is not seeking to enable or give their work to any specific bunch of "[[Wikimedia]]" thugs, they're seeking to give it to all wikipedias. | ||
We should be more concerned with [[edits, votes and bets]] and how [[answer recommendation]] might move things from [[Research Wiki]] to [[Publish Wiki]]. Importing a lot of sysop-approved biased nonsense from [[Wikipedia]] should be low on our list of priorities. Why not just use [[GetWiki]] and get it from [[Wikinfo]] instead? | |||