Editing Talk:E-waste

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
Time to review the so-called [[hardware requirements]] and see if they are actually [[e-waste]] creation non-requirements.
Time to review the so-called [[hardware requirements]] and see if they are actually [[e-waste]] creation non-requirements.


:I view the hardware requirements as something that by market dynamics will be implemented because of demand for such versatile techonologies as [[Bluetooth]] for example. [[NFC]] is another thing that will in my guess be wildly popular within a few years if the mobile phone manufacturers decide to go that way. I guess i should contact the major vendors for inquiring about their intentions
:I view the hardware requirements as something that by market dynamics will be implemented because of demand for such versatile techonologies as [[Bluetooth]] for example. [[NFC]] is another thing that will in my guess be wildly popular within a few years if the mobile phone manufacturers decide to go that way. I guess i should contact the major vendors for inquiring about their intentions regarding [[NFC]] because for [[Consumerium:Usability]] it would be great feature on mobile terminals. It is not controversial and potentially dangerous as [[RFID]] is seen by many.n --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 13:49, 10 Mar 2004 (EET)
 
::These are just assumptions, and "intentions" mean nothing.  Again I refer to [[PCS base station handoff]], which was certainly intended and promised, but which quite a few small companies died waiting for.  Let's not go that way.  THere is also no demand for "technologies", there is demand for features.
 
: regarding [[NFC]] because for [[Consumerium:Usability]] it would be great feature on mobile terminals. It is not controversial and potentially dangerous as [[RFID]] is seen by many.n --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 13:49, 10 Mar 2004 (EET)
 
::Perhaps true, but, until it hits the [[retail shelf]], it's not our problem, nor our opportunity.  [[Paper Consumerium]] is far more promising an avenue, and after that, I'd shoot for [[audio]] delivery using [[FM radio]] or [[cordless protocol]].  These other things always take longer than you think, and only a tiny number of people have them.
 
------------------
 
The term '''[[e-waste]]''' is actually inadequate as it focuses on [[waste disposal]] and not the whole [[comprehensive outcome]], e.g. of [[tantallum]] mining.
Please note that all contributions to Consumerium development wiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see Consumerium:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)
Retrieved from "https://develop.consumerium.org/wiki/Talk:E-waste"