Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| A [[wiki]] needs [[sysops]]. Period. | | A [[wiki]] needs [[sysops]]. Period. |
|
| |
| :It needs *ONE* sysop to deal with [[Vandalism]]. Only. As soon as sysops start to label and resist [[trolls]], their function of stopping vandalism also stops. It's like trying to get cops to control political activity by "subversives", it leads to a police state.
| |
|
| |
|
| Listen here, i'm stuck with gazillion system operators and my usual stance is that the [[operators]] don't mess with me and so it's all calm. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 22:15, 2 Jul 2004 (EEST) | | Listen here, i'm stuck with gazillion system operators and my usual stance is that the [[operators]] don't mess with me and so it's all calm. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 22:15, 2 Jul 2004 (EEST) |
|
| |
| :Yes well as [[Lowest Troll]] you should know how to grovel and squirm. But that does not mean you like it. ;-) You put up with it because of good results. Look how much better we get along with unreasonable people here than [[Wikimedia]] does - they have bureaucracy and formal disputes systems and still fight all the time, we more or less turn every fight into [[trollish|troll poetry]] and then think about it for a good long while before making the next move. And there is no [[sysop vandalism]] which keeps the good people coming back.
| |