Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 10: |
Line 10: |
|
| |
|
| :This is not true. Nature encompasses much more then just humans. | | :This is not true. Nature encompasses much more then just humans. |
| ::this is arguable by philosophers. i don't think it matters. earth belongs to us to steward not destroy. if clothes are manufactured using human slavery, with no destruction to trees, or by clear-cutting the environment of a species which may yield knowledge someday, or by destroying the earth in some way we do not understand the impact to ourselves yet, it's just wrong, no matter how you slice it. God's favorite species will suffer when the earth suffers, we can all agree.
| |
|
| |
|
| There will be impacts from R&D, manufacturing, distribution, use and refuse (sic). | | There will be impacts from R&D, manufacturing, distribution, use and refuse (sic). |
|
| |
| : Isn't refuse a good word for any unwise disposal?
| |