Talk:Alternate wiki-implementations: Difference between revisions
(Pear just more junk; not a requirement) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::Just invite everyone to edit this page. But like I say it will be hard to convince MoinMoin or TikiWiki zealots to come here and submit their work to a MediaWiki-based forum. Also it would be good to know what technology that http://nationmaster.com is using - they seem to be doing a really good job of compiling public data. | ::Just invite everyone to edit this page. But like I say it will be hard to convince MoinMoin or TikiWiki zealots to come here and submit their work to a MediaWiki-based forum. Also it would be good to know what technology that http://nationmaster.com is using - they seem to be doing a really good job of compiling public data. | ||
:::So far these "dedicated developers" don't seem to give a damn if their code is useful for anything but [[Wikipedia]] and its [[sysop power structure]]. If by end of March they don't get into this technology debate, then, it would be appropriate to remove their participation as a plus for [[MediaWiki]]. | |||
----------- | ----------- | ||
| Line 14: | Line 16: | ||
"Pear" is not a "requirement", it is a technology. And it's being replaced by better technologies. | "Pear" is not a "requirement", it is a technology. And it's being replaced by better technologies. | ||
---- | |||
It's time to remove all references to [[R&D wiki]] since ampersands in titles just don't work. So the references will be to [[Development Wiki]], with the [[Opinion Wiki]] renamed [[Research Wiki]], and [[Content Wiki]] renamed [[Signal Wiki]], unless a better solution to remove the ampersands materializes. | |||
This will have to be done sooner, maybe a week, since there is getting to be a lot of reference to the roles of these three proposed [[large public wiki]]s. | |||