Strange articles: Difference between revisions

351 bytes added ,  25 November 2003
strangeness depends on your view of psychiatry, philosophy, economics
(position/argument)
(strangeness depends on your view of psychiatry, philosophy, economics)
Line 2: Line 2:
*: perhaps 142.177.x.x simply meant to use the word 'prophet'? (which could apply to campaigns)
*: perhaps 142.177.x.x simply meant to use the word 'prophet'? (which could apply to campaigns)
*:: or profit equated to power? (generalization?)
*:: or profit equated to power? (generalization?)
*:::More of a [[self-funding]] issue.  This is not so radical if you understand the [[styles of capital]] and [[John McMurtry]]'s and [[Michael Benedikt]]'s analysis.  Give it time.


* [[142.177.X.X]] has gone crazy (again) and wants a [[Consumerium Country]] or maybe s/he just is on the [[Troll]]ing tip again.   
* [[142.177.X.X]] has gone crazy (again) and wants a [[Consumerium Country]] or maybe s/he just is on the [[Troll]]ing tip again.   
Line 7: Line 8:


*[[Best cases]] - an article by our local [[control freak]]
*[[Best cases]] - an article by our local [[control freak]]
*:Some of the best cases can be very strange, and may appear not great to others.  But the best way to make these and the [[visions]] less strange is to add your own.
Anonymous user