Search results

  • ...ervices]] should be able to distribute all data where there is [[privacy]] risk". Then anyone who cares can read Page History to see what the issue is.
    781 bytes (124 words) - 22:23, 26 November 2003
  • ...to track them down and do [[bodily harm]] to them. It is the most basic [[privacy]] concern that we can have regarding [[Consumerium Services]]. Any service ...nder [[international law]]. After all, comments made here may result in a risk to someone's life due to [[ruling party]] activity or revenge from those th
    2 KB (253 words) - 20:15, 22 February 2005
  • ...or indirectly beyond a [[faction]]'s agreed upon [[threshold of acceptable risk]]. ...it is out of scope of Consumerium, except where it affects choices about [[privacy]] (especially [[identifying people]]), and is implied by a [[label]].
    2 KB (240 words) - 19:03, 7 June 2003
  • ...systems as [[RFID]] more or less could be made to work with low [[privacy risk]] (you already [[trust]] Consumerium, so no extra trust is required...) for
    2 KB (291 words) - 21:45, 26 November 2003
  • ...t, nor have "limits" sent around the network to create a further [[privacy risk]]: either the transaction succeeds, or it fails, and all in real time.
    2 KB (292 words) - 21:38, 26 November 2003
  • ...effective way to deliver the [[Consumerium buying signal]], and [[privacy risk]] is not a concern, i.e. most of what is delivered is [[green light ad]]s,
    3 KB (374 words) - 22:14, 10 April 2004
  • ...s]] but tends to be influential in the [[standard]]s, especially [[privacy risk]] measures, that eventually make [[RFID]] acceptable, and limit [[cop]] acc
    4 KB (611 words) - 12:53, 15 August 2004
  • ...Risk</a> (<a href="/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Whatlinkshere&amp;target=Risk" class='internal' title="Special:Whatlinkshere">4 links</a>)</li> ...tle=Privacy_risk&amp;action=edit" class='new' title="Privacy risk">Privacy risk</a> (<a href="/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Whatlinkshere&amp;target=Priva
    123 KB (18,768 words) - 21:42, 6 March 2004
  • ...for the [[consumer privacy]] in our view. There is usually some [[privacy risk]] with new networking technology.
    11 KB (1,646 words) - 19:23, 12 April 2021
  • :[[w:political privacy]] is another matter entirely - some think it should not exist. Only real c ...ough so that casual snooping is impossible. Dectability adds an element of risk for a developer wanting to breach secrecy. Note that for breaches of secrec
    11 KB (1,936 words) - 13:40, 9 September 2004
  • .... The April 2000 rebuild of the PGP key tree at the Computers Freedom and Privacy conference, in Toronto, was actually signed by Terence and Philip - the two ...atastropic losses. No investment in any one company should be allowed for risk management purposes.
    19 KB (3,420 words) - 10:24, 18 July 2016