Editing Service economy
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*Association of goods movements in [[commodity markets]] with [[negative commodity]] (representing [[emission trading|emissions]] or other [[pollution]], [[biodiversity]] loss, [[biosecurity]] risk) [[public bad]]s so that no commodity can be traded without assuming responsibility for damage done by its extraction, processing, shipping, trading and sale - its [[comprehensive outcome]] | *Association of goods movements in [[commodity markets]] with [[negative commodity]] (representing [[emission trading|emissions]] or other [[pollution]], [[biodiversity]] loss, [[biosecurity]] risk) [[public bad]]s so that no commodity can be traded without assuming responsibility for damage done by its extraction, processing, shipping, trading and sale - its [[comprehensive outcome]] | ||
*Easier integration with [[urban ecology]] and [[industrial ecology]] modelling | *Easier integration with [[urban ecology]] and [[industrial ecology]] modelling | ||
*Making it easier to relate to the [[Experience Economy]] of actual [[quality of life]] decisions made by human beings based on assumptions about service, and integrating [[economics]] better with [[marketing]] theory about [[brand value]] e.g. products are purchased for their assumed | *Making it easier to relate to the [[Experience Economy]] of actual [[quality of life]] decisions made by human beings based on assumptions about service, and integrating [[economics]] better with [[marketing]] theory about [[brand value]] e.g. products are purchased for their assumed reliability in some known process. This assumes that the user's experience with the brand (implying a service they expect) is far more important than its technical characteristics | ||
[[Full cost accounting]] and most [[accounting reform]] and [[monetary reform]] measures are usually thought to be impossible to achieve without a good model of the service economy. | [[Full cost accounting]] and most [[accounting reform]] and [[monetary reform]] measures are usually thought to be impossible to achieve without a good model of the service economy. | ||
[[Product stewardship]] or '''product take-back''' are words for a specific requirement or measure in which the service of [[waste disposal]] is paid for at time of purchase. It is often applied to paint, tires, and other goods that become [[toxic waste]] if not disposed of properly. It is most familiar as the [[deposit bottle]] - where one pays for the loan of the bottle at the same time as one purchases what is inside it. Legal requirements vary: the bottle itself may be considered the [[property]] of the purchaser of the contents, or, the purchaser may have some obligation to return the bottle to some depot so it can be [[recycling|recycled]] or re-used. So these are partial implementations of a strict service economy ideal. | [[Product stewardship]] or '''product take-back''' are words for a specific requirement or measure in which the service of [[waste disposal]] is paid for at time of purchase. It is often applied to paint, tires, and other goods that become [[toxic waste]] if not disposed of properly. It is most familiar as the [[deposit bottle]] - where one pays for the loan of the bottle at the same time as one purchases what is inside it. Legal requirements vary: the bottle itself may be considered the [[property]] of the purchaser of the contents, or, the purchaser may have some obligation to return the bottle to some depot so it can be [[recycling|recycled]] or re-used. So these are partial implementations of a strict service economy ideal. | ||