Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| '''Recyclopedia does not exist any more''' | | '''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info) recyclopedia.info] is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]]. It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project. |
|
| |
|
| '''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info recyclopedia.info]) is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]]. It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project.
| | We might consider these to be the best prototype yet of the future [[Development Wiki]]; It is certainly going to attract like-minded people. The odds of a typical [[Recyclopedia contributor]] becoming a [[Consumerium contributor]] are likely much higher than the odds of a [[Wikipedia]], [[Metaweb]] or [[Disinfopedia]] contributor doing so. It seems that it is devoted to presenting a negotiated [[consensus]] between [[Reds]] and [[Greens]] and various [[anarchist]] views. |
|
| |
|
| We might consider these to be the best prototype yet of the future [[Development Wiki]]; It is certainly going to attract like-minded people.
| | ''Accordingly, if a lot of these users come over we may need to recruit some [[Blues]] or [[Pinks]] to balance these rather hardcore views. One problem at a time.'' |
| | |
| The odds of a typical [[Recyclopedia contributor]] becoming a [[Consumerium contributor]] are likely much higher than the odds of a [[Wikipedia]], [[Metaweb]] or [[Disinfopedia]] contributor doing so. It seems that it is devoted to presenting a negotiated [[consensus]] between [[Reds]] and [[Greens]] and various [[anarchist]] views. ''Accordingly, if a lot of these users come over we may need to recruit some [[Blues]] or [[Pinks]] to balance these rather hardcore views. One problem at a time.''
| |
| | |
| ''See some proposed [http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Talk:Recyclopedia:Feature Recyclopedia features] to see if they converge with our needs here, and should perhaps be in [[GetWiki]] for their use and ours.''
| |
| | |
| ''See also [http://www.recyclopedia.info/wiki/?title=User:ThomasKalka ThomasKalka's suggestion] that http://coforum.de become the German Recyclopedia - de.recyclopedia.info and coforum.de would then be synonyms. Can our [[Lowest Troll]] help set up fi.recyclopedia.info as well?''
| |
| | |
| [[Category:Projects that no longer exist]]
| |