Editing Ontological distinction
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[Operational distinction]] is much simpler and less controversial and does not create or imply any POV. It is possible to say objectively that an [[IP range block]] exists, or that an article is on [[Votes for deletion]], or even that its neutrality is disputed, without necessarily having any particular POV or accepting any particular authority. | [[Operational distinction]] is much simpler and less controversial and does not create or imply any POV. It is possible to say objectively that an [[IP range block]] exists, or that an article is on [[Votes for deletion]], or even that its neutrality is disputed, without necessarily having any particular POV or accepting any particular authority. | ||
Failing to distinguish ontological distinctions like "who are the [[trolls]]" from operational ones like "what IP numbers have been blocked in the past" is the basis of [[Wikimedia corruption]]. Those '''confusion'''s which serve the interests of Bomis corporation will be noticed and clarified, while those that do not, will not be. | Failing to distinguish ontological distinctions like "who are the [[trolls]]" from operational ones like "what IP numbers have been blocked in the past" is the basis of [[Wikimedia corruption]]. Those '''confusion'''s which serve the interests of [[Bomis]] corporation will be noticed and clarified, while those that do not, will not be. |