Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| A '''mandatory patent license''' is part of most [[Consortium license]]s. It requires all [[patent]]ed (or even sometimes just "patentable" [[improvement]]) to be licensed to all [[consortium]] members on the same identical terms. It does not necessarily include [[required reintegration]] of new inventions based on the old ones, but it might (that is a separate concern in its own page here).
| | #REDIRECT [[Consortium license]] |
| | |
| Government agencies often are required to offer licenses on patents they file.
| |
| | |
| [[Consumerium License]] might choose to work within a [[Green Patent License]] or [[open patent]] regime eventually - retaining the rights until they can be protected and used for [[self-funding]] if it can be reasonably argued that these might be workable in practice. This is up to the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] which might use different approaches for different parts of the system.
| |
| | |
| See [[healthy signal infrastructure]] for a more general framework of something that the [[healthy buying infrastructure]] of [[Consumerium Services]] might be part of, and which would probably have one or more elements under some such a mandatory license.
| |