Infrastructure owners trust: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Infrastructure owners trust''' is the only reason most [[sysop power structure]]s have any power at all. Whoever "owns the computers and the domain name" chooses personal friends to exercise arbitrary power over everyone else. | '''Infrastructure owners trust''' is the only reason most [[sysop power structure]]s have any power at all. Whoever "owns the computers and the domain name" chooses personal friends to exercise arbitrary power over everyone else. | ||
The [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] for instance is 3/5 | The [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] for instance is 3/5 Bomis employees and has only two token females of non-American origin who have no power whatsoever, not even being consulted in such decisions as how to deal with the [[Red China block]], which the still-reigning [[GodKing]] chooses to deal with unilaterally via the "[[usual happy NPOV talk]]". ''See also [[Wikimedia corruption]].'' | ||
[[Distributed Consumerium]] will actually not be dependent on any one owners' trust regarding central [[Consumerium Services]], since, it will run on widely distributed computers run by just anyone. | |||
However, the [[friendly retail]] locations will still be critically important and without their trust, it is a lot more difficult to deploy the [[Consumerium buying signal]]. So the focus for gaining this '''trust''' should be there, not on pleasing the various owners of infrastructure. |