Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| A '''Green Documentation [[licenses|License]]''' would presumably put some barriers in place to turning contributed [[content]] into [[greewash]], or perhaps using documentation for non-[[Green purposes]] that violate the [[six principles]] which all so-called [[Greens]] believe in, at least according to the [[w:Global Green Charter|Global Green Charter]]. There may also just be a simple set of restrictions that prevent its use for [[war]] and [[ecological devastation]]. At least, to the degree that any license can do that. | | A '''Green Documentation [[licenses|License]]''' would presumably put some barriers in place to using documentation for any purposes that violates the [[six principles]] which all so-called [[w:Greens|Greens]] believe in, at least according to the [[w:Global Green Charter|Global Green Charter]]. There may also just be a simple set of restrictions that prevent its use for war and ecological devastation. At least, to the degree that any license can do that. |
| | |
| While adding [[Invariant Section]]s (which are [[Secondary Section]]s) to the [[GNU FDL]] may warn against use for some purposes, it can't actually prevent such use.
| |
| | |
| A GDL is clearly not [[Free according to Debian]]. But of course, who cares?
| |
|
| |
|
| See also [[Green Software License]], [[Green Patent License]]. | | See also [[Green Software License]], [[Green Patent License]]. |
|
| |
| The [[Consumerium License]] may rely on these licenses to cut some corruption, if the [[Governance Organization]] they use is ultimately compatible with ours.
| |