Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
|
| |
|
| [[Individual buying criteria]] can of course ignore all factions, but this is not likely for most users, who will not have the time or expertise to go through all possibilities, and will almost certainly rely on some [[trusted authority]] or combination of same (making up a faction) to do this for them. | | [[Individual buying criteria]] can of course ignore all factions, but this is not likely for most users, who will not have the time or expertise to go through all possibilities, and will almost certainly rely on some [[trusted authority]] or combination of same (making up a faction) to do this for them. |
|
| |
| Some factionally defined terms may exist in the [[Consumerium License]] since it is certain to be a [[parametric license]] anyway. Effectively, it would be a "define your own [[consortium license]]". By supporting many widely varying [[schema]] for controlling the [[Consumerium buying signal]], the individual's choices of who to trust are more meaningful, since they might control access to certain code or tests or [[trademark]]able [[label data]]. That is, if you see a phrase like "[[no old growth]]", you want reassurance that this is the label that you see on wood in stores generally, and not the interpretation of someone who has decided to use those three words to express their own personal criteria and make them available to others. This might only be controllable via license - see [[licensed deliverables]] for more on the mechanics of labelling.
| |