Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 5: |
Line 5: |
|
| |
|
| We can't really make it any simpler than that. | | We can't really make it any simpler than that. |
| ----
| |
| [[Consumerium:Itself]] contains all the information required to change it. It is [[reflexive]], as [[wikis]] tend to be. This is what makes it likely to work, even if the starting place is wrong.
| |
|
| |
| The only assumption we make, is to make no assumptions that we aren't forced to make.
| |
| :Actually this is not true, at least for me, i've been making assumptions about many things sometimes failing to anticipate the future development sometimes hitting bulls eye and sometimes i'm just not informed. One example is the I figured there were no services similar to [[Consumerium:Itself]] before I discovered many [[Product registries]] exist already. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 13:11, 14 Mar 2004 (EET)
| |
|
| |
| --------
| |
|
| |
| Both of the above points need to be made somehow in the article. If one has no link to [[Transparent Consumerium]] then it isn't clear that [[w:transparency]] is really part of the philosophy. If there's no link to [[Consumerium:Itself]] then it isn't clear that reflexivity is part of the philosophy. And I think in both cases, they are. These are both important [[troll-friendly]] concepts too but you don't have to put that in the philosophy. ;-0 Trolls eat philosophy. Yum yum.
| |
|
| |
| Look at [http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Recyclopedia:policy en: Recyclopedia:policy]. It's about the simplest reflexivity statement possible.
| |