Claims of corruption: Difference between revisions
(the link transit progress shows that documenting these issues can result in some progress - it is neither axiomatic that Wikimedia is corrupt nor inevitable, let these issues stand for resolution) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''N.B. there are certain [[evil trolls]] who assert that Wikimedia may not be corrupt. Take care while reading this page to not fall prey to their [[propaganda]].''' | |||
[[[[Wikipedia]] is the largest [[GFDL corpus access provider]]. It was [[usurper|usurped]] by [[Wikimedia]] in 2003. Since then it has been '''alleged''' to have become increasingly corrupt and unresponsive to contributors and users. Evidence of '''Wikimedia corruption''' includes: | [[[[Wikipedia]] is the largest [[GFDL corpus access provider]]. It was [[usurper|usurped]] by [[Wikimedia]] in 2003. Since then it has been '''alleged''' to have become increasingly corrupt and unresponsive to contributors and users. Evidence of '''Wikimedia corruption''' includes: | ||