Jump to content

Blues: Difference between revisions

597 bytes added ,  24 November 2003
same invite as for Reds
(this is as close as we get to defining "the enemy" for now, and this is important to identify their key ideas)
(same invite as for Reds)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Blues''' are a catch-all term for the [[globalization]] faction that set up the world as it is, and have created a strong need for [[Consumerium Services]] because of things they ignore.  They will likely be at least a [[tendency]] in the [[Consumerium social club]].
'''Blues''' are a catch-all term for the [[globalization]] faction that set up the world as it is, and have created a strong need for [[Consumerium Services]] because of things they ignore.  They will likely be at least a [[tendency]] in the [[Consumerium social club]] saying "oh we can leave THAT up to the market."
 
''The rest of what is said here is controversial and intends to summarize how Blues will fit into the [[Consumerium social club]] and influence perhaps the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]].  Since Blues must define their own values and concerns, '''''no one who does not consider themselves a Blue''''' should edit this article - what is here is only for illustration & discussion, and a copy of the original has been archived, so feel free to edit this now.  If you think you're being stereotyped, you're right, so please just fix this:''


'''Blues''' are the good old conservative guys in (blue) suits who come over the (blue) sea and drop bombs on you from the (blue) sky with some Empire.  Many think [[Pinks]] and [[Greens]] are cute or silly, and [[Reds]] scary.
'''Blues''' are the good old conservative guys in (blue) suits who come over the (blue) sea and drop bombs on you from the (blue) sky with some Empire.  Many think [[Pinks]] and [[Greens]] are cute or silly, and [[Reds]] scary.
Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.