Blues: Difference between revisions
same invite as for Reds
No edit summary |
(same invite as for Reds) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Blues''' are a catch-all term for the [[globalization]] faction that set up the world as it is, and have created a strong need for [[Consumerium Services]] because of things they ignore. They will likely be at least a [[tendency]] in the [[Consumerium social club]] saying "oh we can leave THAT up to the market." | |||
''The rest of what is said here is controversial and intends to summarize how Blues will fit into the [[Consumerium social club]] and influence perhaps the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]]. Since Blues must define their own values and concerns, '''''no one who does not consider themselves a Blue''''' should edit this article - what is here is only for illustration & discussion, and a copy of the original has been archived, so feel free to edit this now. If you think you're being stereotyped, you're right, so please just fix this:'' | |||
'''Blues''' are the good old conservative guys in (blue) suits who come over the (blue) sea and drop bombs on you from the (blue) sky with some Empire. Many think [[Pinks]] and [[Greens]] are cute or silly, and [[Reds]] scary. | '''Blues''' are the good old conservative guys in (blue) suits who come over the (blue) sea and drop bombs on you from the (blue) sky with some Empire. Many think [[Pinks]] and [[Greens]] are cute or silly, and [[Reds]] scary. | ||