Amnesty International: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== copycats == | == copycats == | ||
A similar organization, [[Trollnesty International]], has been suggested to achieve some degree of amnesty for [[trolls]] on various [[large public wiki]]s. Although the idea is ridiculous and insulting to those undergoing actual human rights violations and oppression, it is a logical consequence of the absurd belief in [[virtual community]]. Accordingly, it is likely that [[trolls]] suggest it to highlight differences between real world community and nonsense like [[Wikipedia]]. | A similar organization, [[Trollnesty International]], has been suggested to achieve some degree of amnesty for [[trolls]] on various [[large public wiki]]s. Although the idea is ridiculous and insulting to those undergoing actual human rights violations and oppression, it is a logical consequence of the absurd belief in [[virtual community]]. Accordingly, it is likely that [[trolls]] suggest it to highlight differences between real world community and nonsense like [[Wikipedia]]'s so-called "community", which [[Wikipedia cultist]] enjoy. | ||
Revision as of 22:18, 27 August 2005
Amnesty International is one of the world's most trusted sources of information on detained and "disappeared" persons, human rights records and specific violations.
Its input would certainly be required in the Research:namespace, perhaps most of its records on specific persons and its letters to decision makers could be imported, and any corporation or region mentioned could be highlighted in the Consumerium buying signal.
copycats
A similar organization, Trollnesty International, has been suggested to achieve some degree of amnesty for trolls on various large public wikis. Although the idea is ridiculous and insulting to those undergoing actual human rights violations and oppression, it is a logical consequence of the absurd belief in virtual community. Accordingly, it is likely that trolls suggest it to highlight differences between real world community and nonsense like Wikipedia's so-called "community", which Wikipedia cultist enjoy.