Talk:Link transit: Difference between revisions

320 bytes added ,  8 September 2004
simplest display: superscript on the ordinary page display showing the number of times that particular link was transited
(pretty graph pictures?)
(simplest display: superscript on the ordinary page display showing the number of times that particular link was transited)
Line 14: Line 14:


::::Of course we care about review, but wouldn't that be better served by popularity data than link transit data? What would you do with link transit information? How do you "elaborate" a link? The best use of it I can think of is to pick a small set of related articles, and draw pretty graph pictures. A noble goal, to be sure, but it would require a change to the program below to generate such data efficiently. -- [[User:Tim Starling|Tim Starling]] 06:30, 6 Sep 2004 (EEST)
::::Of course we care about review, but wouldn't that be better served by popularity data than link transit data? What would you do with link transit information? How do you "elaborate" a link? The best use of it I can think of is to pick a small set of related articles, and draw pretty graph pictures. A noble goal, to be sure, but it would require a change to the program below to generate such data efficiently. -- [[User:Tim Starling|Tim Starling]] 06:30, 6 Sep 2004 (EEST)
:::::Pictures aren't really the point.  What if one were able to simply see the number of times that a link was transited in the past month, as a superscripted number ("exponent") on that link?  Then it would just fit in the regular page display.  It would give some idea of the typical paths followed through pages.


This matters because I need to know what the output format should be, and I need to have some way to justify using server resources to generate such data.  
This matters because I need to know what the output format should be, and I need to have some way to justify using server resources to generate such data.  
Anonymous user