Subject-object problem: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(citing non-bullshit portion of Wikipedia article, which has been heavily qualified in stupid wrong verbiage by those afraid of its implications: you don't need Hegel to use a pronoun to gain power)
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
From ''[[w:subject-object problem|en: Wikipedia: subject-object problem]]:''
From ''[[w:subject-object problem|en: Wikipedia: subject-object problem]]:''


"...in ethics, social science and linguistics, the '''subject-object problem''' is a confusion resulting from a shifting, inconsistent or vague assignment of observer and observed, active and passive, status in a sentence. Depending on how one views language, and [[w:mathematics as a langauge|mathematics as a language]], this confusion may extend quite deeply into philosophy of all kinds including that of law, science and [[http://wikinfo.org/wiki.php?title=mathematics|mathematics itself]].
In ethics, social science and linguistics, the '''subject-object problem''' is a deliberate [[power grab]] or unintentional "confusion resulting from a shifting, inconsistent or vague assignment of observer and observed, active and passive, status in a sentence. Depending on how one views language, and [[w:mathematics as a langauge|mathematics as a language]], this confusion may extend quite deeply into philosophy of all kinds including that of law, science and [http://wikinfo.org/wiki.php?title=mathematics mathematics itself].


=== in language ===
=== in language ===
Anonymous user