Talk:Ontological distinction(24): Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(implications for trolls) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The "cogito ergo sum" example is interesting. If it is dualism, then, it is separating cognition from being, to say that cognition ''implies'' being. The cognition (mind) and the being (body) are separate so that one implies the other. Isn't this [[God's Eye View]]? God's cognition implies all beings? | The "cogito ergo sum" example is interesting. If it is dualism, then, it is separating cognition from being, to say that cognition ''implies'' being. The cognition (mind) and the being (body) are separate so that one implies the other. Isn't this [[God's Eye View]]? God's cognition implies all beings? | ||
By contrast the [[GodKing]]'s view, or [[community point of view]], implies only [[trolls]], hated and despised beings, who resist GodKingly [[usurper]]s. | By contrast the [[GodKing]]'s view, or [[community point of view]], implies only [[trolls]], hated and despised beings, who resist GodKingly [[usurper]]s. The [[operational distinction]]s they make when blocking us in their hate and fear, are interpreted (via [[groupthink]]) as [[ontological distinction]]s by other [[sysop power structure]] apologists, and accepted as precedents in their degraded [[troll-formative injustice]] system, leading to [[Wikimedia corruption]]. It clearly exists. But what's the source of it? | ||
That corruption arises from mistaking operational for ontological distinctions, in 24's view, creating simple [[groupthink]]. That is probably optimistic though. There are other theories: it is lack of [[due process]], or over-tolerance for [[systemic bias]] approved POVs, or under-tolerance of [[New Troll point of view]]. According to [[Wikipedia Red Faction]], it is plain and simple political hate. Probably all these theories have some merits. | |||