Infrastructure owners trust: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Infrastructure owners trust''' is the only reason most [[sysop power structure]]s have any power at all. Whoever "owns the computers and the domain name" chooses personal friends to exercise arbitrary power over everyone else. | '''Infrastructure owners trust''' is the only reason most [[sysop power structure]]s have any power at all. Whoever "owns the computers and the domain name" chooses personal friends to exercise arbitrary power over everyone else. | ||
The [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] for instance is 3/5 [[Bomis]] employees and has only two token females of non-American origin who have no power whatsoever, not even being consulted in such decisions as how to deal with the [[Red China block]], which the still-reigning [[GodKing]] chooses to deal with unilaterally via the "[[usual NPOV | The [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] for instance is 3/5 [[Bomis]] employees and has only two token females of non-American origin who have no power whatsoever, not even being consulted in such decisions as how to deal with the [[Red China block]], which the still-reigning [[GodKing]] chooses to deal with unilaterally via the "[[usual happy NPOV talk]]". ''See also [[Wikimedia corruption]].'' | ||
Moving beyond this primitive ritualistic way of assigning power to a real [[board]] that has powers to make critical decisions is quite necessary for [[Consumerium Services]] to be delivered. The [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] will be independent of any particular infrastructure owner, operator or editor. | Moving beyond this primitive ritualistic way of assigning power to a real [[board]] that has powers to make critical decisions is quite necessary for [[Consumerium Services]] to be delivered. The [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] will be independent of any particular infrastructure owner, operator or editor. | ||