Consumerium talk:Intermediate page format: Difference between revisions
Consumerium talk:Intermediate page format (edit)
Revision as of 18:01, 29 February 2004
, 29 February 2004no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Also it's not clear that Criticism/Praise is necessarily the right way to divide comments - that seems [[factionally defined]], since comments that one party might take as a compliment are possible to take as degradation by some other. So maybe we need [[green]] criticism, [[pink]] praise, etc. | Also it's not clear that Criticism/Praise is necessarily the right way to divide comments - that seems [[factionally defined]], since comments that one party might take as a compliment are possible to take as degradation by some other. So maybe we need [[green]] criticism, [[pink]] praise, etc. | ||
Also, it seems that Consensus, Criticism, Praise, or whatever, apply equally well to types of commodity, product, company, country, region or marketing/sale/feedback channel. So we probably have a generic format that is specialized in six ways. A fairly simple inheritance problem. | |||