Talk:Urban ecology: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Usually the most interesting articles are attacked heavily. See [[w:wealth]] and [[w:political economy]]. I put three interesting cut-outs in [[political economy]] here, and perhaps we need [[wealth]] and [[power]] stated here too alon with the other key concepts: | :Usually the most interesting articles are attacked heavily. See [[w:wealth]] and [[w:political economy]]. I put three interesting cut-outs in [[political economy]] here, and perhaps we need [[wealth]] and [[power]] stated here too alon with the other key concepts: | ||
*[[safe]], [[done]] are probably [[individual]] ideas | *[[safe]], [[done]] are probably [[individual]] ideas gained from viewing [[ecology]] of some kind ([[urban ecology]], [[industrial ecology]] and of course real natural [[ecology]]). So you get a different mind from living different lives. | ||
*[[fair]], [[evil]] are probably [[instructional]] | *[[fair]], [[evil]] are probably [[instructional]] - like [[w:moral code]] - or aesthetic - like [[w:moral core]]. | ||
*[[ignore]], [[forgive]] are probably [[social]] | *[[ignore]], [[forgive]] are probably [[social]] maybe tied to [[ecoregion]] - I can ignore or forgive different things in a desert than a boat than a house. | ||
*[[faction]], [[amoral purchasing]] are [[political]] whatever that means. | *[[faction]], [[amoral purchasing]] are [[political]] whatever that means. | ||
I think you get all that right, you probably can make [[Consumerium]] work. | I think you get all that right, you probably can make [[Consumerium]] work. | ||