Talk:GFDL corpus access provider: Difference between revisions
Add topicNo edit summary |
yes, but technical issues have to be solved before the legal ones are relevant |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
:Side note: | :Side note: | ||
:Many of these issues are not unique to wiki. We need Public Internet standards for document exchange and identity. For example, a blogger may want to copy an entry out of their blog into a wiki. Or vice versa. Access to the document itself is interesting, and should be possible by multiple methods. | :Many of these issues are not unique to wiki. We need Public Internet standards for document exchange and identity. For example, a blogger may want to copy an entry out of their blog into a wiki. Or vice versa. Access to the document itself is interesting, and should be possible by multiple methods. - ''from: [http://wikilegal.wiki.taoriver.net/moin.cgi/CorpusAccessProvider CorpusAccessProvider]'' | ||
::Yes, see [[interwiki identity standard]], [[wikitext standard]], [[interwiki link standard]] and [[standard wiki URI]]. With these technical foundations all established, it's much easier to consider legal barriers to text exchange beyond the [[GFDL corpus]]. | |||
Latest revision as of 18:19, 29 May 2004
- Side note:
- Many of these issues are not unique to wiki. We need Public Internet standards for document exchange and identity. For example, a blogger may want to copy an entry out of their blog into a wiki. Or vice versa. Access to the document itself is interesting, and should be possible by multiple methods. - from: CorpusAccessProvider
- Yes, see interwiki identity standard, wikitext standard, interwiki link standard and standard wiki URI. With these technical foundations all established, it's much easier to consider legal barriers to text exchange beyond the GFDL corpus.