Strange articles: Difference between revisions

    (position/argument)
    (strangeness depends on your view of psychiatry, philosophy, economics)
    Line 2: Line 2:
    *: perhaps 142.177.x.x simply meant to use the word 'prophet'? (which could apply to campaigns)
    *: perhaps 142.177.x.x simply meant to use the word 'prophet'? (which could apply to campaigns)
    *:: or profit equated to power? (generalization?)
    *:: or profit equated to power? (generalization?)
    *:::More of a [[self-funding]] issue.  This is not so radical if you understand the [[styles of capital]] and [[John McMurtry]]'s and [[Michael Benedikt]]'s analysis.  Give it time.


    * [[142.177.X.X]] has gone crazy (again) and wants a [[Consumerium Country]] or maybe s/he just is on the [[Troll]]ing tip again.   
    * [[142.177.X.X]] has gone crazy (again) and wants a [[Consumerium Country]] or maybe s/he just is on the [[Troll]]ing tip again.   
    Line 7: Line 8:


    *[[Best cases]] - an article by our local [[control freak]]
    *[[Best cases]] - an article by our local [[control freak]]
    *:Some of the best cases can be very strange, and may appear not great to others.  But the best way to make these and the [[visions]] less strange is to add your own.