What Consumerium is not: Difference between revisions
(sanity rules) |
m (add apostrophe to "dont" -> "don't") |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''What Consumerium is not''' is the most negative view of [[Consumerium Itself]]. For those who consider that things are defined by negation, this list is quite important: | |||
*a general purpose discussion blog | *a general purpose discussion blog | ||
*an anarchist experiment | *an anarchist experiment - we are [[troll-friendly]] only to the degree we have to be to head off certain [[corruption]] and [[accountability problems]] that less troll-friendly wikis run into almost by design | ||
*a playground for "Wikipedians" - especially for | *a playground for "Wikipedians" - especially those who cause those problems | ||
*any of the [[essential projects]] - we | *a peer or friend to the [[enemy projects]] which are competing directly with us for attention from skilled people, and wasting the time of many such folks - often trying and failing to do jobs we can do better, like defining [[Simple English]] or controlling [[sysop vandalism]] or coping with [[political dispute]]s | ||
*any of the [[essential projects]] - we don't compete with them to do the work they do, and we hope they are wise enough not to compete with us and will work with us instead | |||
*[[free software]] necessarily, nor necessarily even [[open source]], nor a representative of any particular ideology - we deliberately let [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] and eventually an [[independent board]] decide what [[software license]] options should be placed on what aspects of this system - if you disagree, well, the entire [[R&D wiki]] is [[GFDL]], so ''[[fork off]]''! | *[[free software]] necessarily, nor necessarily even [[open source]], nor a representative of any particular ideology - we deliberately let [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] and eventually an [[independent board]] decide what [[software license]] options should be placed on what aspects of this system - if you disagree, well, the entire [[R&D wiki]] is [[GFDL]], so ''[[fork off]]''! | ||
Latest revision as of 22:01, 19 August 2005
What Consumerium is not is the most negative view of Consumerium Itself. For those who consider that things are defined by negation, this list is quite important:
- a general purpose discussion blog
- an anarchist experiment - we are troll-friendly only to the degree we have to be to head off certain corruption and accountability problems that less troll-friendly wikis run into almost by design
- a playground for "Wikipedians" - especially those who cause those problems
- a peer or friend to the enemy projects which are competing directly with us for attention from skilled people, and wasting the time of many such folks - often trying and failing to do jobs we can do better, like defining Simple English or controlling sysop vandalism or coping with political disputes
- any of the essential projects - we don't compete with them to do the work they do, and we hope they are wise enough not to compete with us and will work with us instead
- free software necessarily, nor necessarily even open source, nor a representative of any particular ideology - we deliberately let Consumerium Governance Organization and eventually an independent board decide what software license options should be placed on what aspects of this system - if you disagree, well, the entire R&D wiki is GFDL, so fork off!