MediaWiki modifications: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(how the standards fit in)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
''It's presently being debated.  See [[Features]] and [[Consumerium Services]] for the more stable list that motivates these requests.''
''It's presently being debated.  See [[Features]] and [[Consumerium Services]] for the more stable list that motivates these requests.''


== corpus coherence ==
== [[GFDL text corpus|corpus]] coherence ==


The [[interwiki link standard]] (very minor change), [[interwiki identity standard]] and other features [http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Talk:Recyclopedia:Feature on list here] ''which also lists other features like [[Simple English]] and [[Symbolwiki]] conventions that simplify the UI, very important for [[worn device]]s, and other things that can be done without code modification.''
The [[interwiki link standard]] (very minor change), [[interwiki identity standard]] and other features [http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Talk:Recyclopedia:Feature on list here] ''which also lists other features like [[Simple English]] and [[Symbolwiki]] conventions that simplify the UI, very important for [[worn device]]s, and other things that can be done without code modification.''
=== tracking all changes to the corpus ===
So you can see if for instance a [[Disinfopedia]] or [[Wikipedia]] or [[Recyclopedia]] article on a company or promoter changes, plus the several Consumerium Wikis.


=== [[interwiki link standard]] ===
=== [[interwiki link standard]] ===
''as per convention, use links in section titles only if the page MUST be read to understand what follows, if the features invoked are add-ons to the concept''


Without this, your namespaces aren't coherent across [[Consumerium Services]]:
Without this, your namespaces aren't coherent across [[Consumerium Services]]:
Line 45: Line 50:


==[[permission-based model]] ==
==[[permission-based model]] ==
''as per convention, use links in titles only if the page MUST be read to understand what follows''


''These features are controversial, and maybe already in [[tikiwiki]]:''
''These features are controversial, and maybe already in [[tikiwiki]]:''
Anonymous user