33
edits
Political dispute: Difference between revisions
m
I don't believe user:angela advocates any such thing actually
(nature of the issue) |
m (I don't believe user:angela advocates any such thing actually) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
When political disputes arise in the [[content wiki]] there is probably a way to resolve them for purposes of the [[Consumerium buying signal]]. However, this will not usually resolve settling the issue for more than a fixed period of time, after which it should be revisited. No decision made on any political dispute should probably stand for more than a year, without being so revisited. | When political disputes arise in the [[content wiki]] there is probably a way to resolve them for purposes of the [[Consumerium buying signal]]. However, this will not usually resolve settling the issue for more than a fixed period of time, after which it should be revisited. No decision made on any political dispute should probably stand for more than a year, without being so revisited. | ||
The 'once and for all' decision structure propagated by [[GodKing]]s such as and Wikipedia are both anti-political and anti-democratic in nature. There is no excuse for such a structure at Consumerium, it would invite a [[democratize or destroy]] decision almost by definition, if someone were to usurp that power (to resolve a '''political dispute''' unilaterally). [[Trolls]], certainly, would become totally hostile, and would begin to work to destroy Consumerium | The 'once and for all' decision structure propagated by [[GodKing]]s such as and Wikipedia are both anti-political and anti-democratic in nature. There is no excuse for such a structure at Consumerium, it would invite a [[democratize or destroy]] decision almost by definition, if someone were to usurp that power (to resolve a '''political dispute''' unilaterally). [[Trolls]], certainly, would become totally hostile, and would begin to work to destroy Consumerium. | ||