Strange articles: Difference between revisions
(position/argument) |
(strangeness depends on your view of psychiatry, philosophy, economics) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*: perhaps 142.177.x.x simply meant to use the word 'prophet'? (which could apply to campaigns) | *: perhaps 142.177.x.x simply meant to use the word 'prophet'? (which could apply to campaigns) | ||
*:: or profit equated to power? (generalization?) | *:: or profit equated to power? (generalization?) | ||
*:::More of a [[self-funding]] issue. This is not so radical if you understand the [[styles of capital]] and [[John McMurtry]]'s and [[Michael Benedikt]]'s analysis. Give it time. | |||
* [[142.177.X.X]] has gone crazy (again) and wants a [[Consumerium Country]] or maybe s/he just is on the [[Troll]]ing tip again. | * [[142.177.X.X]] has gone crazy (again) and wants a [[Consumerium Country]] or maybe s/he just is on the [[Troll]]ing tip again. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 8: | ||
*[[Best cases]] - an article by our local [[control freak]] | *[[Best cases]] - an article by our local [[control freak]] | ||
*:Some of the best cases can be very strange, and may appear not great to others. But the best way to make these and the [[visions]] less strange is to add your own. | |||
Revision as of 16:29, 25 November 2003
- Life exchange - this is really weird though it just might be that it's 142.177.X.X who wrote it is just thinking in a really radical way. It has some good points about dolphin-safe tuna vs. regular tuna. But the reason I'm moving the link here is because 142.177.X.X is using the word "profit" when talking about campaigns, which doesn't make sense to me. Profit is something expressed in money or otherwise increases buying power and there is no money involved in campaigns, it's about opinions and facts to support those opinions.
- perhaps 142.177.x.x simply meant to use the word 'prophet'? (which could apply to campaigns)
- or profit equated to power? (generalization?)
- More of a self-funding issue. This is not so radical if you understand the styles of capital and John McMurtry's and Michael Benedikt's analysis. Give it time.
- or profit equated to power? (generalization?)
- perhaps 142.177.x.x simply meant to use the word 'prophet'? (which could apply to campaigns)
- 142.177.X.X has gone crazy (again) and wants a Consumerium Country or maybe s/he just is on the Trolling tip again.
- More like a Troll nation I bet.
- Best cases - an article by our local control freak
- Some of the best cases can be very strange, and may appear not great to others. But the best way to make these and the visions less strange is to add your own.