Transparency: Difference between revisions
MattisManzel (talk | contribs) (in general) |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Lack of '''transparency''' is considered a [[bad thing]] in general. Maybe especially in the [[accounting]] of government expenditures. Making processes transparent is a major goal of [[ISO 9000]], [[ISO 14000]] and [[ISO 19011]] regimes. [[Consumerium:Itself|Consumerium, itself]] is basically a transparency mechanism and so should try to comply with those regimes as much as it can. | Lack of '''transparency''' is considered a [[bad thing]] in general. Maybe especially in the [[accounting]] of government expenditures. Making processes transparent is a major goal of [[ISO 9000]], [[ISO 14000]] and [[ISO 19011]] and Emas ([[The Eco-Management and Audit Scheme, EMAS]])regimes. [[Consumerium:Itself|Consumerium, itself]] is basically a transparency mechanism and so should try to comply with those regimes as much as it can. | ||
Latest revision as of 20:53, 22 November 2004
Lack of transparency is considered a bad thing in general. Maybe especially in the accounting of government expenditures. Making processes transparent is a major goal of ISO 9000, ISO 14000 and ISO 19011 and Emas (The Eco-Management and Audit Scheme, EMAS)regimes. Consumerium, itself is basically a transparency mechanism and so should try to comply with those regimes as much as it can.