Talk:Troll-friendly: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
thanks for pointing it out.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Hm, maybe "troll-friendly" just means "we do not assume we know why you did something".
Hm, maybe "troll-friendly" just means "we do not assume we know why you did something".
There's also the general discussion of "troll-friendly wiki" at
http://en.wiki.oekonux.org.uk/Troll-friendly_wiki
though the term is not restricted to wikis, obviously.
-----------
"I am fearful that our open and trusting nature is making us a haven for trolls. -- Daniel Mayer (aka mav)" [http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2004-June/013471.html]
:This is the most laughably stupid thing probably ever written even on the [[vile mailing list]].  In the very same note as the "open and trusting nature" is espoused, various paranoid assertions are made regarding identity that amount to, given Mayer's other professed beliefs, [[outing]].
:Should the [[troll-friendly]] article use Mayer as a bad example?  He does seem to be among the very worst and stupidest sysop fascists.
------------
Thanks to [[User:Ziv]] for pointing out this article needed work.  It is such an important topic we must pay more attention to presenting it very clearly.
Return to "Troll-friendly" page.