Talk:Wiki witchhunt: Difference between revisions

it's not a wiki witchhunt to assign someone to a Sysop Vandal point of view faction based on their selection of (crappy, inaccurate) sources for articles they republish on CH or whoever
(the hunt begins)
(it's not a wiki witchhunt to assign someone to a Sysop Vandal point of view faction based on their selection of (crappy, inaccurate) sources for articles they republish on CH or whoever)
 
Line 12: Line 12:


Is it really the case that someone can write lies about [[Craig Hubley]] but they cannot tell the truth about [[Gus Kouwenhoven]], at [[Consumerium]]?  If so what good is it?
Is it really the case that someone can write lies about [[Craig Hubley]] but they cannot tell the truth about [[Gus Kouwenhoven]], at [[Consumerium]]?  If so what good is it?
--------------
It seems entirely reasonable to assume that someone is from a [[faction]] espousing [[Sysop Vandal point of view]] if they dredge up old junk articles that have no credibility at all and republish them here after they've died and started to rot.  That is neither [[New Troll point of view]] nor is calling someone an advocate of that [[SVpov]] a [[wiki witchhunt]]:  there has been no attempt at [[outing]] or even relating the whole thing to an overall strategy by the [[Wikipedia]] [[sysop power structure]].
Anonymous user